Humanitarianism is always politicized somehow.
It is a political project in a political world. Its mission is a political
one - to restrain and ameliorate the use of organised violence in human
relations and to engage with power in order to do so. Powers that are either
sympathetic or unsympathetic to humanitarian action in war always have
an interest in shaping it their way.
The "politicization of humanitarianism"
is not an outrage in itself. Ethics and politics are not opposites. There
can be good politics, bad politics and some politics that are better than
others. So for humanitarianism to be a politica project is not a contradiction
or necessarily a problem. The real questions for the debate are the ones
that follow from this recognition. These are the ones raised in David Rieff's
book:
- Who is politicising humanitarianism
today, how and to what end?
- Does the predominant politicization
of the day matter to victims?
- If so, what can humanitarians do about
it?