Attachments
Agenda item
- MSNA Protection findings – presentation by REACH Initiative
Summary of discussions
REACH Initiative presented MSNA 2024 results based on 10,434 household interviews, 8,528 face-to face interviews, 1, 852 CATI interviews and 638 KI interviews.
Key takeaways:
- Humanitarian needs are higher in the areas close to FL and RF; safety and security in general drove protection needs - Protection has high overlap with Livelihoods and Health sectors - HLP concerns for IDPs are significant - Particular groups are more impacted by the protection challenges (IDP households, single female care providers, households with children)
The CCIA – Ukraine specific contextualized composite indicator analysis – categorizes each household based on the severity of its humanitarian needs into 5 categories, further explained during the meeting.
Critical indicators measured at the household level for Protection are: - Safety and security (16% severe/11% extreme)
- Barriers to access social services (4% severe)
- HLP needs (9% severe)
- Legal assistance needs (8% severe)
- Child separation (0,22% severe/0,11% extreme) 38% of assessed households nationally were found to have severe needs (level 3) or above sectoral needs
Action Points
Protection Cluster partners are encouraged to familiarise themselves with the results of the MSNA Protection Cluster will follow up with REACH to explore if there are any differences in severity of protection needs in relation to the duration of displacement LAWG: discuss with partners the legal assistance needs; whether it is covered in sufficient quantities, or affected people assign lower prioritization to legal aid over other needs, or realization on the need of the legal aid is not clear for the affected population due to complexity of legislation (i.e. on HLP)
Considering MSNA multi-sectoral methodology, Protection Cluster