Ukraine

Protection Cluster Fact Sheet - January 2016 [EN/RU/UK]

Sources
Posted
Originally published
Origin
View original

Attachments

THE PROTECTION CLUSTER INCLUDES SUB-CLUSTERS ON CHILD PROTECTION, GENDER BASED VIOLENCE AND MINE-ACTION

PROTECTION CONCERNS

  • The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) reports the overall trend of decreasing civilian casualties in the conflict zone of eastern Ukraine, as observed since September 2015, continued. In terms of civilian casualties, January 2016 has been the month with the least casualties since the beginning of armed hostilities in mid-April 2014. Between 1 and 31 January 2016, the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU) recorded at least 18 civilian casualties in the conflict zone: 1 killed and 17 injured. Out of them, 16 adults (7 women and 9 men) and 2 children (a girl and a boy). Half of the casualties (nine injured) were caused by hand grenades and Improvised Explosive Devises (booby traps) urging for intensification of efforts on both sides of the contact line to confiscate hand grenades etc from the local population, and for seizing the practice of planting booby traps at least in those areas where civilians might easily set them off. Seven casualties (1 killed and 6 injured) were caused by small arms and light weapons including at least 3 injured in the contested village of Zaitseve (Donetsk region). The weapons that caused fragmentation wounds to two civilians are unknown.
    HRMMU investigates reports of civilian casualties by consulting a broad range of sources and types of information that are evaluated for their credibility.

  • The Mine Action Sub-Cluster is concerned about the continued occurrence of accidents related to mines and other ERW causing considerable harm to the civilian population, as fatal casualties and injuries continue to be reported. With the onset of spring and the beginning of agricultural activities, as well as a possible uptake in the numbers of returnees to the conflict-affected areas, the numbers of ERW-related incidents can be expected to rise.

  • The identification of victims of human trafficking remains a major challenge due to the limited capacity of authorities and to a weak referral system in place. The deteriorated socio-economic situation, especially regarding IDP single female headed households, makes them particularly vulnerable to engaging in survival sex to support their families with income. Lviv based NGOs stated that preventive measures to raise awareness about the risk of sexual and labor exploitation are necessary.

  • There is a crucial need in shelters for GBV/Domestic Violence survivors in all conflict affected regions of Ukraine. State Centres for Psychosocial Support, NGOs “Slavic Heart”, and Blago Foundation are ready to provide some places; however, they can neither cover demand nor provide adequate case management for the survivors. The GBV sub-cluster, therefore, continues advocating for establishment of safe spaces for GBV survivors particularly in conflict affected regions of eastern Ukraine.

  • Freedom of movement remains a key concern. Despite the official information provided on the web site of the Security Service of Security of Ukraine stating the paper passes issued before 17 July 2015 are still valid, this is not the case in reality and some people, only holding a paper pass have not been able to cross the contact line in January. People also should be properly informed about the need to get electronic passes to avoid problems at the checkpoints.

  • Passport controls and “customs” type activities are now taking place at de facto authority checkpoints at Zaitseve and Elenovka, resulting in long queues. Armed men from the so called “DPR” check passports and register details in a computer database and inspect luggage and goods and collect taxes.

  • Protection partners inform that there have been challenges with implementation of the Law 921 (draft law 2166) as the offices of Department of Social Policy are still using CoM Resolutions No. 509 and 505 in their work as the mechanisms of implementation should be developed within 3 months after the Law has come into force. It leads to confusion and loss of time as IDPs who reach Department of Social Policy are requested to get the State Migration Service stamps on their IDP certificates which the State Migration Service is not putting anymore according to the Law 921.