Nigeria Humanitarian Fund Annual Report 2024

In 2024, the NHF saw a modest increase in funding compared to 2023, with total contributions rising from $18.2 million to $19.3 million, reflecting a 6 per cent increase after the steep 37 per cent decline in 2023. However, funding remains well below the $28.9 million secured in 2022 and marks a dramatic decline (of over 50 per cent) from when the Fund registered its highest contributions ($43.7 million) in 2017.

Germany, traditionally a leading contributor, almost doubled its 2023 support, rising from $3.26 million to $5.63 million in 2024—though still less than half of the $12.4 million provided in 2022. Switzerland emerged as a stronger donor, doubling its 2023 funding, increasing from $1.1 million to $2.28 million.

The United Kingdom continues its steady support, increasing its commitment to $3.22 million, up from $3.09 million in 2023. Sweden and Norway reduced their contributions significantly.

Sweden’s funding dropped 39 per cent, from $2.39 million to $1.45 million, while Norway’s contributions fell by 47 per cent to $1.69 million. Luxembourg rebounded, increasing its contribution from $109,000 in 2023 to $273,000 in 2024, though it remains well below its 2022 level ($908,000).

The decline in NHF funding is a growing concern. Despite the partial recovery from last year, funding remains far below the $30 million annual average seen between 2018 and 2022. This shortfall continues to challenge the NHF’s ability to meet humanitarian needs, with total contributions still only accounting for about 3.5 per cent of total HRP funding, well below the 15 per cent Grand Bargain target.

As a result, the Fund has adopted a more strategic and focused approach to allocations. This involves prioritizing the most urgent needs, limiting the number of partners per allocation, and reducing the number of projects implemented.

Consequently, the Fund’s capacity to support a broader range of humanitarian interventions, particularly in underserved areas, has been constrained. Additionally, reduced funding has diminished the Fund’s flexibility, making it challenging to respond swiftly to emerging crises. This has left critical gaps in essential services such as food security, protection, and health.