Jordan + 1 more

Jordan Response Plan for the Syria Crisis 2016-2018

Format
Appeal
Source
Posted
Originally published
Origin
View original

Attachments

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Jordan Response Plan for the Syria Crisis 2016–2018 represents a three-year programme of high priority interventions to enable the Kingdom of Jordan to respond to the effects of the Syria crisis without jeopardizing its development trajectory.

Situation Analysis

Five years into the crisis the prospects for a prompt return of the millions of Syrian refugees to their home country are remote. Even in the case of a solution to the crisis, it will take more than a decade for the country to rebuild. While some Syrian refugees will return and others may attempt to relocate to third-countries, the majority are expected to remain until the end of the crisis in countries neighbouring Syria, which have generously sheltered them for the past ve years. For host nations, the magnitude and longevity of the crisis will likely translate into mounting costs and ever-increasing challenges to the social, economic and political fabric of the country.

Jordan is host to about 1.4 million Syrians,1 including around 630,000 refugees.2 While some 83 per cent of all refugees have settled in host communities, particularly in the urban area of Amman and the northern governorates of Jordan, the remaining live in refugee camps. In providing for their needs, Jordan has received support from the international community. Funding, however, has not been proportional to response requirements, and while needs are increasing in some sectors, trends in contributions for 2015 suggest that overall international support has not kept pace with the needs. As of November 2015, roughly US$1.07 billion was committed to the JRP2015, which corresponds to 36 per cent of the funding requirements.3 Meanwhile, both refugees and host communities are becoming increasingly vulnerable.

Although refugee inows can present opportunities for important transformations, funding shortfalls have contributed to increased pressure on national services and infrastructure, thereby aecting Jordan’s resilience. Overcrowded health centres and schools, overstretched water, sanitation and municipal services, as well as pressures on the environment, labour and housing markets have le Jordanians feeling increasingly disenfranchised and neglected. Slower-than-forecasted macroeconomic performance and pressure on public spending continues to limit Jordan’s ability to invest in development, ultimately eroding the country’s capacity to maintain its developmental gains and deal with future challenges.