The results of forensic examinations of Iraqi citizens detained by Danish troops and transferred to Iraqi security forces have revealed that they were tortured.
The forensic examinations were performed in Jordan earlier this month by three clinical experts coordinated by the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT).
Five Iraqi citizens – all detained and released without charge in late 2004 - had alleged torture following their transfer by Danish troops to Iraqi forces following random arrest. The preliminary findings indicate that all five had been subjected to ill-treatment amounting to torture.
According to Jørgen Lange Thomsen, Professor of Forensic Medicine at The University of Southern Denmark who took part in the examinations:
“There was convincing evidence that torture had been committed in the form of classical torture methods such as falanga [the beating of the soles of the feet].”
The forensic examinations were performed as part of the IRCT’s ongoing work to document torture through forensic examination, with the twin aims of seeking justice on behalf of the victims and using the work as a deterrent to would-be torturers.
“In light of previous allegations of torture of prisoners in Danish custody, by American security forces in Afghanistan, this news is particularly disturbing. As a signatory to the United Nations Convention Against Torture, Denmark is obliged to ensure that no one is subjected to torture under any circumstances. It would seem that it is not meeting its obligations in this regard.” said Brita Sydhoff, IRCT Secretary-General.
“We are therefore calling for a thorough investigation into the practice of transferring captives, including the banning of transfers where there is a real risk that detainees will be subjected to torture or serious ill-treatment,” concluded Sydhoff.
The Iraqis are being represented by lawyer Christian Harlang who is seeking redress in the Danish courts.
“As a Dane I am ashamed that torture has taken place with Danish acquiescence. I am therefore compelled to take legal action claiming at least a fair compensation on my clients behalf and see that the judiciary set an example to prevent anything similar ever happening again,” explained Harlang.