Informing humanitarians worldwide 24/7 — a service provided by UN OCHA

Eritrea + 2 more

Horn of Africa: IRIN News Briefs, 18 May

UNITED NATIONS
Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
Integrated Regional Information Network for Central and Eastern Africa
Tel: +254 2 622147
Fax: +254 2 622129
e-mail: irin@ocha.unon.org

ETHIOPIA: Continuing offensive defies Security Council

Ethiopian troops on Thursday pushed deep into Eritrean territory on the western front and took Barentu, the strategic regional town and supply route, only hours after a UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo and demanded that military engagement stop. Journalists taken to the frontline reported that, despite calls to halt the war, Ethiopia was continuing the offensive and sending in reinforcements, insisting it had the right to "defend" its sovereignty. Using helicopter gunships, fighter bombers and heavy artillery, Ethiopia now controlled "much of the skies of the Western Mereb front without Eritrean response", a BBC journalist reported from the territory. The journalist reported seeing "mile upon mile of abandoned Eritrean trenches previously heavily defended" high in the mountains. A new political dimension now complicated what was previously essentially a border conflict, as Ethiopia had to decide whether to hand back territorial gains or annex the territory, the BBC report said.

ERITREA: War-affected civilians flee western advance

The Eritrean Relief and Refugee Committee said half a million people were fleeing the Ethiopian advance, west of the country, creating a new humanitarian crisis. Eritrean state radio accused Ethiopia of "intentionally bombing and shelling civilian targets" in its massive offensive. The Eritrean government has asked local UN officials to secure emergency international aid for the civilians fleeing the Ethiopian advance. Humanitarian sources said people affected by the advance included war-affected displaced Eritreans living in temporary camps and Eritreans expelled by the Ethiopian government from northern Ethiopia over the past two years.

Save the Children Fund (SCF) said the fighting threatened 15,000 children among the 80,000 inhabitants of camps for the displaced in the Gash Barka region, west of Asmara, AFP reported. The agency's director of emergency programmes, Bruce Macinnis, told AFP that any interruption or delay in their feeding programme would "lead immediately to a considerable rise in their malnutrition". He said food distribution was likely to be hampered by the large number of trucks deployed in the war effort and that efforts had been made to get trucks from available sources, including Sudan. Local aid personnel working for international and humanitarian agencies are being recruited for service, humanitarian sources told IRIN.

ERITREA: Loss of territory acknowledged

"The civilian dimension of this is horrendous", Eritrean government spokesman Yemane Ghebremeskel told AFP, but he claimed the military were withstanding the assault, and making tactical withdrawals. The spokesman admitted there was now "a very large area under the invasion of the Ethiopian army" but claimed Eritrea had not suffered "significant casualties" and had not lost "important military equipment", AFP reported.

ETHIOPIA-ERITREA: Security Council imposes arms embargo

In a unanimously adopted resolution, the UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo on Ethiopia and Eritrea and demanded that both parties withdraw forces from military engagement, and "take no action that would aggravate tensions". It also demanded that peace talks under the OAU should be reconvened "without preconditions" as soon as possible. The arms embargo calls on all States to prevent the selling or supplying to the two countries "by their nationals or from their territories, or using their flag vessels or aircraft, of arms and related materiel of all types, including weapons and ammunition, military vehicles and equipment, paramilitary equipment and spare parts". The resolution also prevents "any provision to those two countries by their nationals or from their territories, of technical assistance or training related to the provision, manufacture, maintenance or use of the above items."

ETHIOPIA-ERITREA: Monitoring of the arms embargo

Conditions of the UN arms embargo include strict monitoring. The resolution requests States to report in detail to the Secretary-General within 30 days of the date of adoption on "the specific steps they have taken to give effect to the measures imposed". It also requires "all states, relevant United Nations bodies and, as appropriate, other organisations and interested parties to report information on possible violations" and to make the information public. The Secretary-General will report on the implementation of the arms embargo and the humanitarian situation in the two countries every 60 days. During the two-year conflict, journalists have reported both countries using resident Russian nationals to train and fly sophisticated modern fighter planes. Monitoring of abuses may be more difficult in Eritrea, which has access to ports, unlike land-locked Ethiopia, diplomatic sources said.

The US-based Global Intelligence Update said the Ethiopian offensive was unlikely to threaten Asmara, but may instead attempt "to divert the defenders in the hope of creating a breach on the southeastern front, at the town of Bure ... and seize the port of Assab, regaining access to the Red Sea and its trading routes." It said Ethiopia, facing both drought and famine, "has strong incentive to capture the port in advance of any peace agreement".

ETHIOPIA-ERITREA: Major stockpiling undermines effect of embargo

Announcement of the arms embargo provoked criticism by some observers who felt the Security Council had waited too long to take action against a war that is considered the largest in Africa, in terms of troop numbers and sophisticated weaponry. A regional analyst told IRIN that the arms embargo would make little difference to the two countries, which had spent the last two years buying sophisticated ground and air weaponry. They said the effect of the resolution was mainly "a poke in the eye". Horn of Africa commentator Patrick Gilkes told the BBC that the embargo would not have a significant effect. The embargo would mean the two countries "may have to pay a bit more, but they have got what they need at the moment", he said. He attributed the success of the Ethiopian offensive partly to the fact that Ethiopia's build-up of weaponry had been "a little bit bigger", but mainly to the element of surprise. Ethiopia attacked on the Western front and seized Barentu, instead of moving on the already established Mereb front. Gilkes said the Ethiopians were likely to use the new territory as "a bargaining chip".

SUDAN: Fears of new refugee influx from Eritrea-Ethiopia fighting

Sudan has called for international aid to deal with an expected new wave of refugees from the fighting between Eritrea and Ethiopia, a Sudanese newspaper reported on Thursday. Al-Ayam said that Ibrahim Mahmoud Hamid, governor of Kassala state, which is on the Eritrean border, had appealed to the UNHCR to take emergency measures to deal with the problem. It quoted Hamid as saying that the state did not have sufficient resources to provide food and shelter for the potential influx and asked for international aid organisations to make preparations to receive the refugees. A UNHCR spokesman told IRIN he was not aware of any new influx of refugees into Sudan as a result of the fighting.

Before the latest fighting, there were some 160,000 Eritrean refugees in Sudan, most of them in Kassala state. The majority had been there since before 1991, when Eritrea won its independence. Last month, UNHCR signed an agreement with the governments of Sudan and Eritrea for the planned repatriation of some of these refugees. The plan had provided for the return of 10,000 to 15,000 people by September.

SUDAN: Khartoum accuses SPLM of sabotaging IGAD peace talks

Following the official postponement of the IGAD peace talks, scheduled to take place in the Kenyan capital Nairobi from 17-23 May, the Sudanese government issued a statement on Thursday accusing the rebel Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) of sabotaging the peace process. The postponement of the talks followed Monday's announcement by the SPLM that it was suspending its participation because of what it called "reckless bombing" of civilian targets in SPLM-controlled areas of southern Sudan, the Nuba mountains and eastern Sudan. The government statement denied that its forces were engaged in aerial attacks on civilian areas. It said areas of engagement between government forces and rebels were taking place only where no civilians were residing. In such areas it said legitimate weapons" were being used since "there are no civilians at risk". The statement accused the SPLM of attempting to shroud its real intentions, which were to fight. "The SPLM/SPLA opted for thwarting and sabotaging this unique peace opportunity, an option which was evidently not adopted with a view to serving the interests of the civilian population," the statement said.

[ENDS]

[IRIN-CEA: Tel: +254 2 622147 Fax: +254 2 622129 e-mail: irin-cea@ocha.unon.org ]

[This item is delivered in the English service of the UN's IRIN humanitarian information unit, but may not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations. For further information, free subscriptions, or to change your keywords, contact e-mail: irin@ocha.unon.org or Web: http://www.reliefweb.int/IRIN . If you re-print, copy, archive or re-post this item, please retain this credit and disclaimer.]

Copyright (c) UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 2000