Headlines (most recent)
- UN DESA: Increase in global number of international migrants continues to outpace growth of the world’s population. 17 Sep 2019
- Kindernothilfe: Water shortage exacerbates disaster risk; tropical islands top table. 17 Sep 2019
- IOM: IOM manual to help with mental health and psychosocial support in emergencies. 17 Sep 2019
- IOM: Detaining migrant children is not only wrong, but ineffective, says UN migration network. 16 Sep 2019
- UNCCD: Countries agree to make ‘land degradation neutrality’ by 2030 a national target. 15 Sep 2019
Most read reports
- IOM: Child Immigration Detention is Not Only Wrong, It Is Ineffective. 16 Sep 2019
- UNHCR: DAFI Annual Report 2018: Refugee student voices - Refugee Students in Higher Education. 16 Sep 2019
- World Bank: Harvesting Prosperity: Technology and Productivity in Agriculture. 16 Sep 2019
- UNCCD: The New Delhi Declaration: Investing in Land and Unlocking Opportunities. 15 Sep 2019
- IEP: Global Peace Index 2019. 12 Jun 2019
by Diana Quick
A shared statement by peacebuilding organizations
International Day of Peace, 21 September 2018
The last year has seen significant global challenges, including an unprecedented level of humanitarian need, rising inequality and exclusion, growing climate change impacts, and increasing threats to our shared security. Nevertheless, the international community has taken important steps in addressing these challenges by implementing the recent bold commitments to foster sustainable peace.
Natascha Zupan and Sylvia Servaes
“Unless Colombian NGOs successfully convey their multidimensional understanding of peace to the international development community, the paradoxical situation could quickly arise in which overseas funding for their work is ultimately linked to the perpetuation of the armed conflict, not to the attainment of a lasting peace.”
DDR programs have traditionally been designed and implemented in total isolation from transitional justice measures, of which reparations for victims is one kind. It is only recently that the approach that considers DDR as essentially a technical issue to be decided exclusively on the basis of military and security concerns with no regard for political or justice considerations has begun to be questioned. The incentives to try to bring the worlds of the peacemaker and of the justice and human rights promoter together, however, are manifold.
For the past three years, FriEnt, the German Working Group on Development and Peace, has been focussing on the subject of transitional justice. FriEnt has organized a series of roundtable discussions for its member organizations, provided expertise and advice and has published a guidance paper on transitional justice and dealing with the past.
The transitional justice concept, with its various mechanisms, offers practical starting points for the planning of measures in peace oriented development work. In particular, it enables state and civil society actors to link and ensure complementarity between their various activities. The point in time and the form and combination of mechanisms that can be applied in a given country will depend on the specific context. For development and peace organisations, this raises ques-tions about their own role, choice of partners, and the design and timing of ac-tivities, etc.
On 17 October 2006, the Working Group for Development and Peace (FriEnt) and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) jointly organised an international workshop on the "Responsibility to Protect: Perspectives of the South and the North". The workshop aimed to discuss the comprehensive nature of the concept and find answers to questions regarding its implementation.
On 26 and 27 September 2006, the Working Group for Development and Peace (FriEnt) and the German Development Institute (DIE) jointly organised an international workshop on "Dealing with Spoilers in Peace Processes". The workshop aimed to find answers to questions regarding spoilers in peace processes and identify possible follow-up activities within the frame of FriEnt's new priority topic "spoilers".
How can NGOs and think tanks from the academic field contribute more effectively to shaping international strategies for crisis prevention at national and EU level? And how are state and non-state actors already cooperating in crisis pre-vention and peace-building policy? These were the questions at the core of the workshop documented in this report.